Summary

1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns… (1997)

The Democrats’ loss of Congress, along with the President’s concern that he might face a primary challenge, fueled an urgent need for political money. The President and his top advisors decided to raise money early for his re-election campaign. To accomplish their goal, the President and his top advisors took control of the DNC and designed a plan to engage in a historically aggressive fund-raising effort, utilizing the DNC as a vehicle for getting around federal election laws.
Source: Wikisource

1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns… (1997)

Ickes, however, also wished to claim credit for using DNC “issue” advertising to circumvent federal election laws. He testified that he conceived of financing Morris’ advertising campaign with “soft” money to run so-called “issue ads” on which unlimited money could be spent.52 Ickes volunteered that, “Basically, it was my idea.”53
Regardless of whether Ickes or Morris deserves the “credit” for hatching a scheme to violate the laws, there is no doubt that this early spending of “soft” money was driven by the President’s reelection.
Source: Wikisource

1997 Special Investigation in Connection with 1996 Federal Election Campaigns… (1997)

The pressure to raise such enormous amounts of money was pervasive. DNC National Finance Director Richard Sullivan characterized the DNC in 1996 as engaged in “an historic effort in terms of the aggressiveness of the fund-raising.”94 Sullivan told the Committee that the DNC “raised an enormous amount of money,” adding that, in the 1995-96 period, the DNC “almost tripled the amount raised in the 1991-92 election cycle.”95 DNC National Chairman Don Fowler stated that there were “pressing needs during the campaign to raise large sums of money .
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature