Summary

A. Dayton Oliphant DeVries v. Evening Journal Association… (1952)

If the defendant had furnished specifications which the plain-tiff could not meet at the price fixed surely the plaintiff would not be answerable for any breach of the con-tract.
There was a sharp conflict in the testimony presented and the trial court had the opportunity and advantage of observing the witnesses and was in a position to evaluate their credibility to a greater extent than can an appellate tribunal. His findings of fact are entitled to great weight. The credibility of witnesses is an important consideration in the determination of factual issues.
Source: Wikisource

A. Dayton Oliphant DeVries v. Evening Journal Association… (1952)

The necessity for such an agreement is amply evidenced by the cabled requests for the specifications sent from Holland to the defendant, by letters, and by the fact that the newsprint was never completed or shipped.
It is fundamental that the essential element to the valid consummation of a contract is a meeting of the minds of the contracting parties and that until there is such a [p120] meeting of the minds either party may withdraw and end all negotiations.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature