Summary

Archelaus Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI, Acts of Disputation… (1885)

If you allege that the shepherd exposed the kid or the lamb to the lion, when the said lion was meditating an assault [1] on the unbegotten, the case is closed. For seeing that the shepherd of the kids and lambs is himself proved to be in fault to them, on what creature can he pronounce judgment, if it happens that the lamb which has been given up [2] through the shepherd’s weakness has proved unable to withstand the lion, and if the consequence is that the lamb has had to do whatever has been the lion’s pleasure?
Source: Wikisource

Archelaus Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI, Acts of Disputation… (1885)

Surely, then, the lamb, when under the lash, and interrogated by the shepherd as to the reason why it had submitted to the lion in these matters, would make some such answer as this: “Thou didst thyself deliver me over to the lion, and thou didst offer no resistance to him, although thou didst know and foresee what would be my lot, when it was necessary for me to yield myself to his commandments.” And, not to dilate on this at greater length, we may say that by such an illustration neither is God exhibited as a perfect shepherd, nor is the lion shown to have tasted alien meats
Source: Wikisource

Archelaus Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI, Acts of Disputation… (1885)

For he has given out that he is that Paraclete whom Jesus on His departure promised to send to the race of man for the salvation of the souls of the faithful; and this profession he makes as if he were somewhat superior even to Paul, [6] who was an elect vessel and a called apostle, and who on that ground, while preaching the true doctrine, said: [7] “Or seek ye a proof of that Christ who speaks in me?”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature