Summary

Byron White,  Dunban-Stanley Studios, Inc. v…

“ If firms operating precisely as appellant does, and mailing their film to a central point within the State for development, are taxed as transient photographers then there is no unconstitutional discrimination against interstate commerce. But if appellant is taxed as a transient photographer because its films are sent for development across a state line, then there is discrimination against interstate commerce. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature