Summary

Byron White United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Association…

To carve out an exception from the word 'export' based on this Court's notions of sound economic policy is to contradict the plain words of the statute and the congressional judgment that American associations were necessary to lower prices and combat foreign competition. If such an exception were ever justified, it would be in a case where not only are Americans paying the bill, but also foreign competition is absent.
Source: Wikisource

Byron White United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Association…

The majority asserts that Congress thought it could increase American exports by ending competition for foreign shipments among American firms without impairing domestic competition. That is correct. Congress recognized that trade in foreign nations is not ringed about with the antitrust restrictions which keep domestic industry competitive. Congress found foreign trusts to have substantial advantages over their American competitors. They can offer to extend credit and fill large orders which no single American firm could fill
Source: Wikisource

Byron White United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Association…

In a transaction such as this, where American goods compete with foreign goods for foreign consumption, Congress had no objection to the formation of American associations to achieve lower prices and compete with foreign suppliers. That such competition was involved here is graphically illustrated by the fact that in most of the Korean purchases involved in this case [6] foreign bidders were successful in capturing at least part of the market, and the Government admits that foreign competition was never absent.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature