Summary

Byron White,  Wells v. Rockefeller — Dissent

“ The Court nevertheless now rules that regard for these boundaries is no justification for districts which vary no more than 3% from the norm where another plan which may have no regard for district lines reduces the variation to an even smaller figure. I have similar objections to the Court's rejection of geographical compactness as an acceptable justification for minor variations among congressional districts. This rejection of the virtues of compactness will not be lost on those who would use congressional and legislative districting to bury their political opposition. ”
Source: Wikisource

Byron White,  Wells v. Rockefeller — Dissent

“ In terms of the gerrymander, the situation will not be much different if equality means what it literally says-a zero variation-rather than only 'substantial' equality which would countenance some variations among legislative districts. Either standard will prevent a minority of the population or a minority party from consistently controlling the state legislature or a congressional delegation, and both are powerful forces toward equalizing voter influence on legislative performance. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature