Summary

Charles Evans Hughes Hamburg-American Line v. United States…

Equally unavailing is the plea that the fine, as prescribed, is indivisible, and hence that no fine whatever can be imposed where the alien is admitted and the transportation company, for that reason, has not been required to return the passage money. It is true that the requirement of the payment of the passage money is for the benefit of the alien and the reason for that part of the penalty disappears on the alien's admission.
Source: Wikisource

Charles Evans Hughes Hamburg-American Line v. United States…

The section makes it unlawful for a transportation company to bring to the United States 'any immigrant who does not have an unexpired immigration visa.' The alien was a 'nonquota immigrant' within the definition of the statute. Id., section 4 (b) , 8 U.S.C. 204 (b) , 8 USCA § 204 (b) . If it appears to the satisfaction of the Secretary of Labor that 'any immigrant has been so brought,' the transportation company must pay to the collector of customs the sum of $1,000, and in addition, for the benefit of the immigrant, an amount equal to that paid for his transportation.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature