Summary

David Davis Avery v. United States — Opinion of the Court

If so, and the United States, on this account, were indebted to Avery (a point on which we express no opinion) , it was the duty of Avery to plead this indebtedness by way of set-off, to the action brought against him. It is a familiar principle that no one can be relieved against a judgment, however unjust he may consider it, if he had a defence and, through his own fault, failed to present it.
Source: Wikisource

David Davis Avery v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The lease of the house was authorized, if the owner of the property was voluntarily absent from it and engaged in the rebellion, and, as the Federal military forces during the term of the lease occupied Memphis, it is fairly to be inferred that Avery had abandoned his house under circumstances which warranted the officers of the government in taking possession of it
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature