Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer United States v. Shea — Opinion of the Court

But where the general owner retains the possession, command, and navigation of the ship, and contracts for a specified voyage, as, for example, to carry a cargo from one port to another, the arrangement, in contemplation of law, is a mere affreightment, sounding in contract, and not a demise of the vessel, and the charterer or freighter is not clothed with the character or legal responsibility of ownership.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer United States v. Shea — Opinion of the Court

A demise may be for a day as well as for a year, and may be terminable at the will of the lessor. The pay, by the fourth article, was to be 'for each vessel employed.'
Not only this, but the conduct of the parties in the execution of the contract removes all obscurity as to its scope and meaning. As the findings show, the vessel, the James Bowen, was furnished by petitioner, and was accepted and used by the defendants. During the time of its use it was under the exclusive management and control of the defendants.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature