Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Wight v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Whatever the Baltimore & Ohio Company might lawfully do to draw business from a competing line, whatever inducements it might offer to the customers of that competing line to induce them to change their carrier, is not a question involved in this case. The wrong prohibited by the section is a discrimination between shippers. It was designed to compel every carrier to give equal rights to all shippers over its own road, and to forbid it by any device to enforce higher charges against one than another.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Wight v. United States — Opinion of the Court

They ask whether, if one shipper has a siding connection with the road of a carrier, it cannot run the cars containing such shipper's freight onto that siding, and thus to his warehouse, at the same rate that it runs cars to its own depot, and there delivers goods to other shippers who are not so fortunate in the matter of sidings.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Wight v. United States — Opinion of the Court

With reference to all other matters, it is enough to say that our attention is called to no errors in the admission of testimony; and we see nothing in the instructions asked and given or asked and refused which could injuriously affect the rights of the defendant, or limit the specific interpretation by the court of the rules of law applicable to those facts.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature