Earl Warren,
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham…
“ Petitioners were convicted for inciting, aiding, and abetting a violation of the city trespass ordinance. The trespass 'violation' was that committed by the petitioners in Gober v. City of Birmingham, 373 U.S. 374, 83 S.Ct. 1311. [4] Since the convictions in Gober have been set aside, it follows that the present petitioners did not incite or aid and abet any crime, and that therefore their own convictions must be set aside.It is generally recognized that there can be no conviction for aiding and abetting someone to do an innocent act. ”
