Summary

Fayolle v. Texas Pacific Railway Company…

That was too late, as the appeal had become inoperative through the failure of the appellants to docket the case here at the return-term. Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U.S. 505, and cases there cited; Killian v. Clark, 111 U.S. 784, 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 700; Caillot v. Deetken, 113 U.S.; 215, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 432. The excuse presented for the failure to docket in time is not sufficient to give the appellants the benefit of any exception to this rule, which was recognized in Grigsby v.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature