Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Goesaert v. Cleary — Opinion of the Court

Michigan could, beyond question, forbid all women from working behind a bar. This is so despite the vast changes in the social and legal position of women. The fact that women may now have achieved the virtues that men have long claimed as their prerogatives and now indulge in vices that men have long practiced, does not preclude the States from drawing a sharp line between the sexes, certainly, in such matters as the regulation of the liquor traffic.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Goesaert v. Cleary — Opinion of the Court

Since bartending by women may, in the allowable legislative judgment, give rise to moral and social problems against which it may devise preventive measures, the legislature need not go to the full length of prohibition if it believes that as to a defined group of females other factors are operating which either eliminate or reduce the moral and social problems otherwise calling for prohibition. Michigan evidently believes that the oversight assured through ownership of a bar by a barmaid's husband or father minimizes hazards that may confront a barmaid without such protecting oversight.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature