Summary

Portrait of Fred M. Vinson Fred M. Vinson Dixon v. Duffy (344 U.S. 143)…

Admitting that habeas corpus is ordinarily an available means to California prisoners to challenge the constitutionality of the proceedings which resulted in the incarceration, the Attorney General told us that the writ was unavailable in this particular case, to this particular petitioner becaue he could have and should have presented his federal claim in an appeal from his original conviction. Counsel for petitioner vigorously opposed this contention, insisting that habeas corpus was an available remedy under California law, that the federal question was properly before the court.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature