Summary

George Milligan 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 15… (1911)

According to some (as De Quincey in his famous Essay) the sole object of Judas was to place Jesus in a position in which He should be compelled to make what had seemed to His followers the too tardy display of His Messianic power: according to others (and this view seems more in harmony with the Gospel narratives) Judas was an avaricious and dishonest man, who had already abused the confidence placed in him (John xii. 6) , and who was now concerned only with furthering his own ends.
Source: Wikisource

George Milligan 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 15… (1911)

Cholevius, in his Geschichte der deutschen Poesie nach ihren antiken Elementen (1854) , pointed out the connexion of the legend with the Oedipus story. According to Daub (Judas Ischariot, oder Betrachtungen über das Böse im Verhältniss zum Guten, 1816, 1818) Judas was “an incarnation of the devil,” to whom “mercy and blessedness are alike impossible.”
The popular hatred of Judas has found strange symbolical expression in various parts of Christendom.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature