Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Prudence Realization Corporation v…

Postponement of its rights in the mortgage to those of the other certificate holders is not justifiable as operating to avoid circuity of action. The Prudence Company is not solvent. Its property is being liquidated in bankruptcy where all the claimants on its present and other guaranty obligations are entitled to share equally in its unpledged assets.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Prudence Realization Corporation v…

Matter of People (Union Guarantee & Mortgage Co.) , 285 N.Y. 337, 34 N.E.2d 345, that a guarantor of mortgage certificates, who also has an interest in the mortgage, cannot share in the proceeds of its collection until the certificate holders are paid, unless there is a clear reservation in the certificate of the right of the guarantor to share on a parity with other certificate holders. The Circuit Court of Appeals by a divided court held that it was bound to apply the rule announced in the New York cases cited, which it deemed to be a rule of construction of the guaranty of the certificates.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature