Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. Marshall Transport Company…

Section 5 (4) makes it unlawful, without the approval of the Commission as provided by § 5 (2) (a) , for a person which is not a carrier and which has control of one or more carriers to acquire control of another carrier through ownership of its stock or otherwise. Not only is this language broad enough in terms to embrace the acquisition of control by a non-carrier through the purchase, by a controlled carrier, of the property and business of another carrier, but the legislative history indicates that such was its purpose.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. Marshall Transport Company…

The Commission also emphasized the fact that, as the motor carrier business is now organized, purchase of the assets and franchises of carriers would be the usual and in many cases the only feasible method of acquiring control of them. It pointed out that many of the businesses are owned by individuals or partnerships, often possessing extensive operating rights.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. Marshall Transport Company…

In the case of corporations their stock is usually closely held and they are without outstanding long-term debt obligations. In all these cases a simple and usual method of acquiring control of other carriers is by the cash purchase of their assets and operating rights and the assumption of their liabilities followed by liquidation of the vendor. The Commission concluded, 'Proceeding thus through a controlled subsidiary, a non-carrier holding company, or others, may expand at will without becoming subject to our jurisdiction under the construction adopted by the division.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature