Summary

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun United States v. Bass — Dissent

When a man has been convicted of a felony, unless as this bill sets forth-he has been expressly pardoned by the President and the pardon states that the person is to be permitted to possess firearms in the future, that man would have no right to possess firearms. He would be punished criminally if he is found in possession of them.' 114 Cong.Rec. 13868 (emphasis supplied) .
'So Congress simply finds that the possession of these weapons by the wrong kind of people is either a burden on commerce or a threat that affects the free flow of commerce.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun United States v. Bass — Dissent

The structure of the vital language and its punctuation make it refer to one who receives, to one who possesses, and to one who transports in commerce. If one wished to say that he would welcome a cat, would welcome a dog, or would welcome a cow that jumps over the moon, he would likely say 'I would like to have a cat, a dog, or a cow that jumps over the moon.' So it is here.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun United States v. Bass — Dissent

Stated simply, they may not be trusted to possess a firearm without becoming a threat to society. This title would apply both to hand guns and to long guns.
'All of these murderers had shown violent tendencies before they committed the crime for which they are most infamous. They should not have been permitted to possess a gun. Yet, there is no Federal law which would deny possession to these undesirables.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature