Summary

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown United States v. Alabama G. S. Railroad Company…

It is especially objectionable that a construction of a statute favorable to the individual citizen should be changed in such manner as to become retroactive, and to require from him the repayment of moneys to which he had supposed himself entitled, and upon the expectation of which he had made his contracts with the government.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown United States v. Alabama G. S. Railroad Company…

In this case the language would be confined to the linear parts of such roads as received the aid of the land grants,-in the case under consideration, only that part of the road lying in Alabama or Mississippi; or they may mean that railroads, any linear part of which received the aid of a land grant of congress in its construction, should be bound to carry the mails at a reduced rate over the entire line. This-which is doubtless the literal reading of the statute-supports the contention of the government in this case.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature