Summary

Portrait of Horace Harmon Lurton Horace Harmon Lurton Richardson v. McChesney — Opinion of the Court

The matter which the defendant McChesney, as secretary of the commonwealth of Kentucky, is to be prohibited from doing, relates solely to an election to be held in November, 1908, and the thing which he is to be required to do relates only to the same election. The election to be affected by a decree, according to the prayer of the bill, has long since been held, and the members of Congress were, in November, 1908, elected under the apportionment act of 1900.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Horace Harmon Lurton Horace Harmon Lurton Richardson v. McChesney — Opinion of the Court

The contention is that, the act of 1898 and its amendments being void, because of gross inequality of inhabitants, the aforesaid act of April 15, 1882, is the apportionment act in force, and that the approaching election should be held for the election of eleven members of Congress in the eleven districts organized by the act of 1882, and not in the districts as shaped by the later illegal arrangement.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature