Summary

Portrait of Howell Edmunds Jackson Howell Edmunds Jackson Passavant v. United States — Opinion of the Court

In the tariff legislation of the government, congress has generally adopted means and methods for a speedy and equitable adjustment of the question as to the market value of imported articles, without allowing an appeal to the courts to review the decision reached. If dissatisfied importers, after exhausting the remedies provided by the statute to ascertain and determine the fair dutiable value of imported merchandise, could apply to the courts to have a review of that subject, the prompt and regular collection of the government's revenues would be seriously obstructed and interfered with.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Howell Edmunds Jackson Howell Edmunds Jackson Passavant v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The provisions of the customs administrative act of June 10, 1890, as to the finality and conclusiveness of the decision of the board of general appraisers as to the valuation of imported merchandise, when that question has been regularly submitted to and examined by them, is expressed in clearer and more emphatic terms than in former statutes. The language is so explicit as to leave no room for construction.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature