Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v…

Bargaining agents who enjoy the advantages of the Railway Labor Act's provisions must execute their trust without lawless invasions of the rights of other workers. We agree with the Court of Appeals that the District Court had jurisdiction to protect these workers from the racial discrimination practiced against them. On remand, the District Court should permanently enjoin the Railroad and the Brotherhood from use of the contract or any other similar discriminatory bargaining device to oust the train porters from their jobs.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v…

The Federal Act thus prohibits bargaining agents it authorizes from using their position and power to destroy colored workers' jobs in order to bestow them on white workers. And courts can protect those threatened by such an unlawful use of power granted by a federal act.
Here, as in the Steele case, colored workers must look to a judicial remedy to prevent the sacrifice or obliteration of their rights under the Act. For no adequate administrative remedy can be afforded by the National Railroad Adjustment or Mediation Board.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v…

These facts showed that the Negro train porters had for a great many years served the Railroad with loyalty, integrity and efficiency; that 'train porters' do all the work of brakemen; [3] that the Government administrator of railroads during World War I had classified them as brakemen and had required that they be paid just like white brakemen; that when the railroads went back to their owners, they redesignated these colored brakemen as 'train porters,' 'left their duties untouched,' and forced them to accept wages far below those of white 'brakemen' who were Brotherhood members
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature