Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local 37 v…

And some of the union members are evidently about to be denied the right ever to return to their homes on grounds that could not have been legally applied to them had they stayed in California or Washington instead of going to Alaska to work for an important American industry.
Thus the threatened injury which the Court dismisses as 'remote' and 'hypothetical' has come about. For going to Alaska to engage in honest employment many of these workers may lose the home this country once afforded them. This is a strange penalty to put on productive work.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local 37 v…

They denied that Congress intended to require alien workers to forfeit their right to live in this country for no reason at all except that they went to Alaska, territory of the United States, to engage in lawful work under a lawfully authorized collective-bargaining contract. The defendant immigration officer announced that the union's interpretation was wrong and that workers going to Alaska would be subject to examination and exclusion.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature