Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black McCrone v. United States — Opinion of the Court

United States
Argued: March 30, 1939. --- Decided: April 17, 1939
The Court of Appeals dismissed petitioner's appeal from a judgment of contempt for failure to obey a District Court's order to testify before an Internal Revenue official. [1] This dismissal was proper if the contempt proceeding was civil and not criminal. A notice of appeal was filed and a bill of exceptions signed. But petitioner's appeal was not, as appeals from civil judgments were required to be, applied for or allowed by the trial judge or a judge of the Court of Appeals.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black McCrone v. United States — Opinion of the Court

In accordance with its constitutional authority to do so, Congress has expressly authorized such a proceeding by an agent of the United States in the Federal courts 'to compel * * * attendance, testimony, or production of books, papers, or other data.' 26 U.S.C. § 1523, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1523. [7]
While particular acts do not always readily lend themselves to classification as civil or criminal contempts, a contempt is considered civil when the punishment is wholly remedial, serves only the purposes of the complainant, and is not intended as a deterrent to offenses against the public.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature