Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black McNair v. Knott — Opinion of the Court

It has been, and is now, the policy of most states to require security for public funds whether deposited in state or national banks. The weight of judicial authority in the state courts has supported the doctrine that banks could pledge security for public deposits, but not for private deposits. [4]
The Senate Committee on Banking and Currency which made a favorable report on the Enabling Amendment gave information to the Senate in its report that millions of dollars worth of collateral had been pledged by national banks as security for public deposits.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black McNair v. Knott — Opinion of the Court

To determine that Congress did not intend to validate pledge agreements existing when the amendment was passed would greatly limit its curative effect. Such a construction would be an unwarranted departure from the plain intent of this curative and enabling statute.
Second. Appellant insists that the contract could not be validated by changing the law which was in force when the pledge agreement was made.
There is nothing novel or extraordinary in the passage of laws by the federal government and the States ratifying, confirming, validating, or curing defective contracts.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature