Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Fairmont Creamery Company v. Minnesota…

As the inhibition of the statute applies irrespective of motive, we have an obvious attempt to destroy plaintiff in error's liberty to enter into normal contracts, long regarded, not only as essential to the freedom of trade and commerce, but also as beneficial to the public. Buyers in competitive markets must accommodate their bids to prices offered by others, and the payment of different prices at different places is the ordinary consequent.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Fairmont Creamery Company v. Minnesota…

Often the buyer represents the creamery as an adjunct of his other business. Often his compensation is through a commission. He may have a place to receive the product, or it may be delivered directly to the railroad station. A centralized creamery, supplied with ample capital and facilities, has the ability and meets the temptation to destroy competition at a buying station by overbidding, absorbing the resultant losses, if any, through the profits of its general business, and, when competition is ended, to buy on a non-competitive basis.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature