Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Slaker v. O'Connor/Opinion of the Court…

Together those cases determine that, where a writ of error or appeal is dismissed because the alleged ground therefor is so unsubstantial as to be frivolous, a penalty may be imposed. In the first cited case, writ of error to state court, penalty of 5 per centum was imposed upon the plaintiff in error; in the second, an appeal from federal court, the appellant was subjected to penalty of $1,500 and required to pay the costs.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Slaker v. O'Connor/Opinion of the Court…

Under the Act of February 13, 1925, amending Judicial Code, § 240 (b) , 28 USCA § 347 (b) , appeals to this court from Circuit Courts of Appeal lie only from final judgments or decrees (Martinez v. International Banking Corp., 220 U.S. 214, 223, 31 S.C.t. 408, 55 L. Ed. 438; Collins v. Miller, 252 U.S. 364, 370, 40 S.C.t. 347, 64 L. Ed. 616) in cases where the validity of a state statute is drawn in question on the ground of repugnance to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, and the decision is against its validity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature