Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Sumi v. Young — Opinion of the Court

Upon motion, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion averred: (1) The cause involves no question arising under the Constitution, statute, or treaty of the United States, or any authority exercised thereunder; (2) no monetary value exceeding $1,000 is involved; (3) the petitioner was not a party in the Probate Court. Section 128, Judicial Code, [1] also section 943, Act of June 6, 1900, [2] were relied upon in opposition.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Sumi v. Young — Opinion of the Court

The manner or mode of taking and perfecting such appeal shall be the same manner or mode which is provided for the taking and perfecting of an appeal from other appealable judgments made and entered in the District Court.'
This proposal is in conflict with the purpose and limitations of the later Acts of 1911 and 1925. These are of general application, and any provision of the Alaska Code concerning appeals to the Circuit Court of Appeals inconsistent with them is ineffective.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature