James Crisfield

“ The subject tribunal determined by a vote of 2-to-1 that the detainee was properly classified as an enemy combatant. In an articulat and thoughtful dissent, one of the tribunal members opined that the Unclassified Summary of Evidence was deficient because it failed to present a prima facie case that the detainee is an enemy combatant. [1] The Unclassified Summary of the Evidence is not intended to be a charging document that alleges each and every fact necessary to establish that an accused has committed a crime. ”

“ Its legal meaning refers to evidence that, standing along and un-rebutted, is legally sufficient to establish an offence, defense, or cause of action. ↑ The preponderance of the evidence standard my be simply stated as "more likely than not." ”