Summary

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Dermott v. Jones (64 U.S. 220)…

A failure by the plaintiff to finish and deliver on that day is fatal to a recovery upon the special contract. The plaintiff in the first amended count declares upon it as such, avers his performance accordingly, and the proof is that he had not so performed. We infer, from the whole contract, that it was the intention of the parties that the performance of the work was to be a condition precedent to the payment of the second instalment. There is no word in the contract to make that doubtful.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Dermott v. Jones (64 U.S. 220)…

And when the work was done by the plaintiff, however imperfectly that may have been, the defendant accepted it.
The law in such a case implies, that the work done and the materials furnished were to be paid for. The general rule of law is, that while a special contract remains open-that is, unperformed-the party whose part of it has not been done cannot sue in indebitatus assumpsit to recover a compensation for what he has done, until the whole shall be completed.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Moore Wayne James Moore Wayne Dermott v. Jones (64 U.S. 220)…

In the trial of such an action, where the defence is not presented as a matter of set-off, arising on an independent contract, but for the purpose of reducing the plaintiff's damages, because he had not complied with his cross obligations arising on the same contract, the defendant may be allowed a recoupment from the damages claimed by the plaintiff for such loss as she shall have sustained from the negligence of the plaintiff.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature