Summary

John Archibald Campbell Refeld v. Woodfolk — Opinion of the Court

The purchaser is stimulated to employ vigilance and care in reference to the things as to which they will secure him from injustice, while it affords no shelter for bad faith on either part.
The intermediate cases-those in which the parties have advanced in the completion of their contract, and are still willing to abide by it, and there arises a real inability or a wellfounded apprehension of danger, in that stage of their proceedings, to the completion of the contract-have created much embarrassment.
Source: Wikisource

John Archibald Campbell Refeld v. Woodfolk — Opinion of the Court

The decree of the Circuit Court assumes that the loss may be total; and the indemnity awarded was determined as if the fact would correspond with the possibility. This appeal was made to test the validity of this decree.
A court of chancery regards the transfer of real property in a contract of sale and the payment of the price as correlative obligations. The one is the consideration of the other; and the one failing, leaves the other without a cause.
Source: Wikisource

John Archibald Campbell Refeld v. Woodfolk — Opinion of the Court

If the contract has been executed by the delivery of possession and the payment of the price, the grounds of interference are limited by the covenants of the deed, or to cases of fraud and misrepresentation. 'The cases will show,' say this court, 'that a purchaser in the undisturbed possession of the land will not be relieved against the payment of the purchase money on the mere ground of defect of title, there being no fraud or misrepresentation
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature