Summary

Portrait of John Catron John Catron United States v. Briggs (50 U.S. 351…

By that act, any person, who shall cut and appropriate live-oak or red-cedar trees reserved for naval purposes, is clearly indictable, and, on conviction, may be fined and imprisoned. We do not understand this to be controvered. But the question here is, whether the term 'or other timber' imposes the same penalty on those who cut other timbers, such as oak or hickory trees.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Catron John Catron United States v. Briggs (50 U.S. 351…

On consideration whereof, it is the opinion of this court, that the offence charged and set forth in the indictment in this cause, of cutting, removing, or using, for any other than naval purposes, any trees or timber standing, growing, or being on any lands belonging to the United States, whether reserved for naval purposes or not, is, under the statutes of the United States, an indictable offence, and punishable by fine and imprisonment
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature