Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Commissioner of Internal Revenue v…

For example, if a doctor prescribes that a patient must go to Florida in order to alleviate specific chronic ailments and to escape unfavorable climatic conditions which have proven injurious to the health of the taxpayer, and the travel is prescribed for reasons other than the general improvement of a patient's health, the cost of the patient's transportation to Florida would be deductible but not his living expenses while there. However, if a doctor prescribed an appendectomy and the taxpayer chose to go to Florida for the operation not even his transportation costs would be deductible.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Commissioner of Internal Revenue v…

M17 (1954) ; Memorandum of Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation, 1 Senate Hearings on the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 24 (1954) ; Memorandum of the Under Secretary of the Treasury, id., at 103. It is that factor which is of controlling importance here. [5]
We need not consider whether we would be warranted in disregarding these unequivocal expressions of legislative intent if the statute were so written as to permit no reasonable construction other than that urged on behalf of the taxpayer.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature