John Marshall Harlan II

John Marshall Harlan II

Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Smith v. Illinois — Dissent

In the face of these developments, the Court's suggestion that perhaps the defense nevertheless did not know Jordan's name or address is, to say the least, exceedingly dubious. At no point did defense counsel, or defendant, state that he lacked the requested information, nor did counsel pursue the point with any vigor after the State's objections to the questions; he simply turned to another series of questions without suggesting any way in which his attempt to present a defense had been prejudiced.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II Smith v. Illinois — Dissent

Later, however, defense counsel said of the witness 'I represented him before, I know him.' Still later, when asked by defense counsel on direct examination how long he had known James Jordan, the defendant replied, 'I'd say a new years or so, casualty.' The defendant also indicated that he knew Jordan to be a narcotics addict, and that he knew that Jordan was acquainted with a person whose legal name he knew to be Herbert Simpson.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature