Joseph McKenna, Ahrenfeldt v. Miller — Opinion of the Court
“ Garvan, 254 U.S. 554, 41 Sup. Ct. 214, 65 L. Ed. 403, and Stoehr v. Wallace, 255 U.S. 239, 41 Sup. Ct. 293, 65 L. Ed. 604.'The order is affirmed.'It is manifest that the case is identical in legal principle, and to a certain and material extent in contentions, with cases Nos. 575 and 292, and is necessarily involved in their ruling. ”
Joseph McKenna, Ahrenfeldt v. Miller — Opinion of the Court
“ The District Court denied the petition, holding that the question sought to be litigated by Ahrenfeldt can be raised only after the demand of the Alien Property Custodian has been complied with, and then only by proceedings authorized by Section 9 of the Act, as amended June 5, 1920 (41 Stat. 977) . 282 Fed. 943. That the District Court was right is established by the decisions of the Supreme Court in Central Union Trust Co. ”
