Summary

Joseph McKenna South Dakota v. Collins — Opinion of the Court

He has not appeared to contend to the contrary, and at the taking of the testimony his defense or extenuation was that he acted upon his faith in a decision of the Supreme Court of Colorado, and, to evade or to withhold aid from any possible criminal prosecution, he declined to answer in regard to transactions concerning the receipt of interest on the public moneys he had deposited in various banks.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature