Summary

Joseph P. Bradley Insurance Company v. Norton — Opinion of the Court

If it should repudiate its agreement, it could not repudiate the waiver of the forfeiture, without at least giving to the assured reasonable notice to pay the money.
Forfeitures are not favored in the law. They are often the means of great oppression and injustice. And, where adequate compensation can be made, the law in many cases, and equity in all cases, discharges the forfeiture, upon such compensation being made. It is true, we held in Statham's Case (93 U.S. 24) , that, in life insurance, time of payment is material, and cannot be extended by the courts against the assent of the company.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature