Summary

Portrait of Joseph Rucker Lamar Joseph Rucker Lamar Matheson v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The act of March 3, 1909 (35 Stat. at L. 839, chap. 269) , in providing for a fourth division, did not contemplate an interruption of the functions of the judge throughout the entire district, nor did it destroy the unity of the district court. But while preserving unimpaired the power of the court and judges, it fixed a new place, at which the same district court must be held. It did not create a new tribunal, with new officers, to be organized in a new political division, but it continued the jurisdiction and power of the judge to be exercised anywhere in Alaska.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature