Melville Fuller,
Baltimore Traction Company v. Baltimore Belt Railroad Company…
“ Briggs, 97 U.S. 628; Louisville, N. O. & T. Ry. Co. v. Mississippi, 133 U.S. 590, 10 Sup. Ct. 348. At the time of these proceedings, therefore, notice was required. No suggestion is made that the validity of the statute was drawn in question as repugnant to the constitution of the United States in any other particular; and, as the want of requirement of notice did not exist, the alleged ground of our jurisdiction fails.Writ of error dismissed. Notes This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105) . ”
