Summary

Michael S. Farbman Russia & The Struggle for Peace…

With every month of the war they became more and more conscious that a disaster was inevitable. The old corrupt bureaucracy was incapable of managing the war and of co-ordinating and turning to good account the popular energy and enthusiasm. Public opinion demanded—not even the real democracy to which the Russian people aspired—but merely a Government which should take the people into its confidence in the prosecution of the war.
Source: Wikisource

Michael S. Farbman Russia & The Struggle for Peace…

Why should the manufacturers be concerned about the future? Their profits during this period promised to exceed anything that had ever been dreamt of before, or would ever come again. An intelligent and incorrupt Government would have compelled the manufacturers to enlarge their plant. Less speculative and less rapacious manufacturers would themselves have spared their old plant and made every effort to enlarge it. But the Russian Government was only too glad when the crisis, which might have ended in revolution, brought about such unexpected co-operation with the people.
Source: Wikisource

Michael S. Farbman Russia & The Struggle for Peace…

In effect, the crisis of 1905 took place during a great war; that of 1915 during a greater war, a war with more disastrous possibilities. The people were too much oppressed with the sense of failure and disaster and too much preoccupied by their eagerness to relieve the situation, to think of revolutionary changes. They had too much to do in taking over their new duties and responsibilities in the organisation for victory. The crisis of 1915 did not lead to revolution because the people and the army were not yet ripe for revolution.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature