“ Appellant contends that the decree should be treated as supplementary to that directed by this Court in Knott v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co., supra, and as appealable directly to this Court because the decree in the Knott Case was so appealable. Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co., 249 U.S. 134, 142, 39 S.Ct. 237, 63 L.Ed. 517.
The Court is of the opinion that it lacks statutory authority to entertain the appeal. The appeals in the Missouri Rate Cases and Knott v. ”

“ Murdock v. Memphis, 20 Wall. 590, 620, 22 L.Ed. 429; The Francis Wright, 105 U.S. 381, 384-386, 26 L.Ed. 1100; St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Taylor, 210 U.S. 281, 292, 28 S.Ct. 616, 52 L.Ed. 1061; Luckenbach S.S.C.o. v. ”