Summary

Nathan Clifford Larned v. Burlington — Opinion of the Court

It was an action of debt to recover the amount of two bonds, each for one thousand dollars, with interest at the rate of eight per cent. per annum. They were issued on the seventeenth day of June, 1852, under an ordinance of the city to authorize a loan, to be invested in the stock of the plank-road company mentioned in the declaration. Allegations of the declaration were substantially the same as in the preceding case. Corporation defendants appeared and demurred to the declaration and showed for cause, (1) That the mayor and recorder of the city had no power to issue the bonds
Source: Wikisource

Nathan Clifford Larned v. Burlington — Opinion of the Court

Hacket, #fn-s-s-s [2] which is the last of the series to which reference will be made,-all of these cases, proceeding upon the ground that the construction of a railroad for travel and transportation was a public improvement, and that it was competent for the legislature to authorize municipal corporations to furnish material aid for such a work, and we have no doubt that the views of the court were entirely correct.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature