Summary

Nathan Clifford Ray v. Norseworthy — Opinion of the Court

Authority is doubtless posessed by the assignee to sell the property of the bankrupt, whether the same is or is not incumbered, but when he sells incumbered property without any special order from the court he sells the same subject to any and all lawful incumbrances, and can convey no better or higher interest than the bankrupt could have done.
Source: Wikisource

Nathan Clifford Ray v. Norseworthy — Opinion of the Court

Beyond all doubt the property of a bankrupt may, in a proper case, be sold by order of the bankrupt court free of incumbrance, but it is equally clear that in order that such a proceeding may be regular and valid the assignee must apply to the bankrupt court for an order to that effect, and must set forth the facts and circumstances which it is supposed justify the application, that the judge may decide whether or not the application shall be granted.
Source: Wikisource

Nathan Clifford Ray v. Norseworthy — Opinion of the Court

No man is to be condemned without the opportunity of making a defence, or to have his property taken from him by a judicial sentence without the privilege of showing, if he can, that the pretext for doing it is unfounded. Every person, as this court said in the case of The Mary, [10] may make himself a party to an admiralty proceeding and appeal from the sentence, but notice of the controversy is necessary in order to enable him to become a party.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature