Noah Haynes Swayne,
Mitchell v. United States (88 U.S. 350…
“ The place where a person lives is taken to be his domicile until facts adduced establish the contrary. [6] The proof of the domicile of the claimant at Louisville is sufficient. There is no controversy between the parties on that proposition. We need not, therefore, further consider the subject.A domicile once acquired is presumed to continue until it is shown to have been changed. [7] Where a change of domicile is alleged the burden of proving it rests upon the person making the allegation. [8] To constitute the new domicile two things are indispensable: First, residence in the new locality ”
