Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Kawananakoa v. Polyblank — Opinion of the Court

A suit presupposes that the defendants are subject to the law invoked. Of course it cannot be maintained unless they are so. But that is not the case with a territory of the United States, because the territory itself is the fountain from which rights ordinarily flow. It is true that Congress might intervene, just as, in the case of a state, the Constitution does, and the power that can alter the Constitution might. But the rights that exist are not created by Congress or the Constitution, except to the extent of certain limitations of power.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Kawananakoa v. Polyblank — Opinion of the Court

As the ground is thus logical and practical, the doctrine is not confined to powers that are sovereign in the full sense of juridical theory, but naturally is extended to those that, in actual administration, originate and change at their will the law of contract and property, from which persons within the jurisdiction derive their rights.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature