Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Leary v. United States (253 U.S. 94…

But it is thought that indemnity includes defences of the indemnifying fund against unexpected attacks, that if the trustee fails to make it the cestui que trust may do so, and that in either event the fund should be charged. It does not matter that the United States is the opposing party, as its rights in the fund are inferior to those that Leary now has successfully affirmed.
Source: Wikisource

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Leary v. United States (253 U.S. 94…

But the obligation to pay the judgment was absolute, not confinced to a payment from these funds, and the claim for the cost of resisting it has on foundation. We also are of opinion that the deduction of poundage by the clerk was proper as in other cases of money kept and paid out by him. But it is said that this item and the expense of defending the trust should be borne by the residue of the funds in the clerk's hands after deducting the amount paid in respect of the judgment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature