Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Piza Hermanos v. Caldentey — Opinion of the Court
“ We do not see it, but if there has been any oversight in this respect, our affirmance of the judgment will be without prejudice to reopening the account for the single purpose of correcting errors of calculation if permitted upon application to the Supreme Court. ”
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Piza Hermanos v. Caldentey — Opinion of the Court
“ But it appears that the opinion of both courts that they found the appellants to have admitted the propriety of charging an increase in the value of the estate as a profit, so that the question was narrowed to one of amount. The principle being settled in this way, it was applied to the unsold crops. We do not go behind these well-warranted findings of fact, and really there is nothing else before us. ”
