Summary

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Southern Pacific Company v. Darnelltaenzer Lumber Company…

The only question before us is that at which we have hinted: whether the fact that the plaintiffs were able to pass on the damage that they sustained in the first instance by paying the unreasonable charge, and to collect that amount from the purchasers, prevents their recovering the verpayment from the carriers. The answer is not difficult. The general tendency of the law, in regard to damages at least, is not to go beyond the first step.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature