Summary

Portrait of Origen Origen Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. IV, Origen… (1885)

Let us, accordingly, to those who do not regard them as gods reply as follows: These beings, then, are not gods at all; but agreeably to the view of those who think that the soul of man perishes immediately (after death) , the souls of these men also perished; or according to the opinion of those who say that the soul continues to subsist or is immortal, these men continue to exist or are immortal, and they are not gods but heroes,—or not even heroes, but simply souls.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Origen Origen Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. IV, Origen… (1885)

If, then, on the one hand, you suppose them not to exist, we shall have to prove the doctrine of the soul’s immortality, which is to us a doctrine of pre-eminent importance; [4] if, on the other hand, they do exist, we have still to prove [5] the doctrine of immortality, not only by what the Greeks have so well said regarding it, but also in a manner agreeable to the teaching of Holy Scripture.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Origen Origen Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. IV, Origen… (1885)

Celsus, omitting no species of mockery and ridicule which can be employed against us, mentions in his treatise the Dioscuri, and Hercules, and Æsculapius, and Dionysus, who are believed by the Greeks to have become gods after being men, and says that “we cannot bear to call such beings gods, because they were at first men, [2] and yet they manifested many noble qualifies, which were displayed for the benefit of mankind, while we assert that Jesus was seen after His death by His own followers;”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature