Summary

Portrait of Origen Origen Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. IV, Origen… (1885)

He might, indeed, either be a god who had obtained as his lot (the obligation) to dwell on earth for ever, and be thus a fugitive, as it were, from the abode of the gods, or he might be one who had no power to share in the society of the gods in heaven; [1] or else Apollo, and Æsculapius, and those others who are believed to perform acts on earth, would not be gods, but only certain demons, much inferior to those wise men among mankind, who on account of their virtue ascend to the vault [2] of heaven.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Origen Origen Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. IV, Origen… (1885)

We shall mention, however, a few considerations out of a greater number, such as we deem in harmony with our former arguments, but which have not altogether the same bearing as they, and by which we shall show that in asserting generally that no God, or son of God, ever descended (among men) , he overturns not only the opinions entertained by the majority of mankind regarding the manifestation of Deity, but also what was formerly admitted by himself.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature